Q&A services support clinicians by offering clinically relevant information with minimal effort. One of my most frequent moans (aside from middle-lane hoggers on the motorway) has been the poor sharing of answered questions.
Many of our questions are dealt with 'sorry, we found no evidence', which may seem a poor answer, but clinicians seem to be happy with these. However, a number also receive more complex answers with multiple evidence sources.
Why not create a journals to formalise these answers? Why not have our answer followed by a 'commentary' by a clinician (be it a generalist or specialist)? The format of the journal 'Evidence-Based Medicine' springs to mind (see for an example). This has the abstract followed by a commentary. See below for truncated image.