In recent AskTrip activity we’re seeing clusters of related Q&As around stroke. These clusters may reflect how evidence is used in practice. We tried mapping the questions along a stroke care continuum – from Acute & Emergency through Secondary Prevention to Rehabilitation & Recovery – and then added logical “next questions” we haven’t been asked yet.

So, below are a list of Qs, those with a hyperlink have been asked already and suggested Qs are listed as ‘supplementary’.

As mentioned in the title this is a ‘thinking out loud’ post – seeing what things look like. It’s helpful to air these ideas…. One can see issues immediately, for instance ‘What are the most effective secondary prevention strategies for reducing stroke recurrence?‘ and ‘What are the current best practices for managing patients with a history of stroke to prevent recurrence?‘ are very similar in scope. But that’s the nature of posting this sort of thing – helps you highlight the issues.

While there are still some rough edges, the bottom-up nature of this approach feels refreshing. I can’t help but wonder: might this become part of Trip/AskTrip’s future?

A structured map of evidence questions from acute care to recovery


1. Acute & Emergency Management


2. Secondary Prevention (Reducing Recurrence)


3. Rehabilitation & Recovery


Cross-cutting Priorities

  • Supplementary questions:
    • How should patients and caregivers be educated about stroke warning signs and secondary prevention?
    • What are the cost-effective models of long-term follow-up in primary vs. specialist care?
    • How can access to stroke rehab services be improved in underserved populations?