Currently Trip includes a sub-set of PubMed. This includes all RCTs and systematic reviews and the content of around 500 ‘core’ journals. In total this represents around 10-15% of all the PubMed content. Putting it another way we have around 3-4 million PubMed records out of around 28 million.
But, to be clear not all records are equal. Some will be to do with veterinary medicine (e.g. Serum amyloid A and plasma fibrinogen concentrations in horses following emergency exploratory celiotomy) and others might be very specialised technical articles (e.g. Phase-matched virtual coil reconstruction for highly accelerated diffusion echo-planar imaging). So, we’ll be potentially including extra noise. We can mitigate against that – to a point.
In summary, searching all of PubMed is potentially very useful but there may be downsides. So with that in mind what do you think?
April 7, 2019 at 9:17 pm
I’d be afraid to loose a lot of specifity; maybe add a button “run this search on pubmed” thus leaving tripdatabase
LikeLike